The ports lights on our PowerConnect 5448 are blinking very quickly in unison.  We use this switch for a desktop network.  No servers or computers are available on the network.  We believe this was due to a power outage that caused a failure with our internet connection.  We restored power to the modem and re-booted the firewall since it was off.  Then we noticed the lights on the switch.  We manually powered off the PC 5448 switch and then powered it back on.  The switch still shows the same problem.  We can directly connect to the modem so we know we have internet.  It appears something is wrong with the switch due to the blinking port lights.

In addition, the admin user and password to log into the switch are lost, so we cannot see what is going on.

Hola buenos dias tengo tres equipos DELL Power Connect serie 3548 Firmware 2.0.0.53 y de repente se me colapsa mi red y me doy cuenta porque telefonos IP pierden conectividad en el log de mis tres equipos veo lo siguiente...

2147482509 03~Nov~2015 11:55:39 Info %LINK-I-Up: e36
2147482510 03~Nov~2015 11:55:37 Warning %LINK-W-Down: e36
2147482511 03~Nov~2015 11:52:45 Info %LINK-I-Up: e10
2147482512 03~Nov~2015 11:52:35 Warning %LINK-W-Down: e10
2147482513 03~Nov~2015 11:51:02 Info %LINK-I-Up: e23
2147482514 03~Nov~2015 11:50:52 Warning %LINK-W-Down: e23
2147482515 03~Nov~2015 11:46:08 Info %LINK-I-Up: e40
2147482516 03~Nov~2015 11:45:58 Warning %LINK-W-Down: e40
2147482517 03~Nov~2015 11:45:01 Info %LINK-I-Up: e41
2147482518 03~Nov~2015 11:44:51 Warning %LINK-W-Down: e41
2147482519 03~Nov~2015 11:44:27 Info %LINK-I-Up: e13
2147482520 03~Nov~2015 11:44:18 Warning %LINK-W-Down: e13
2147482521 03~Nov~2015 11:43:30 Info %LINK-I-Up: e20
2147482522 03~Nov~2015 11:43:21 Warning %LINK-W-Down: e20
2147482523 03~Nov~2015 11:42:41 Info %LINK-I-Up: e12
2147482524 03~Nov~2015 11:42:32 Warning %LINK-W-Down: e12
2147482525 03~Nov~2015 11:32:19 Info %LINK-I-Up: e37
2147482526 03~Nov~2015 11:28:12 Warning %LINK-W-Down: e37
2147482527 03~Nov~2015 11:27:42 Warning %LINK-W-Down: e26
2147482528 03~Nov~2015 11:14:38 Info %LINK-I-Up: e30
2147482529 03~Nov~2015 11:14:36 Warning %LINK-W-Down: e30
2147482530 03~Nov~2015 11:14:29 Info %LINK-I-Up: e30
2147482531 03~Nov~2015 11:14:27 Warning %LINK-W-Down: e30

A que podra deberse dicha falla?

De antemano gracias por su apoyo.

Hi,

I'm new to networking and working with switches and I've been googling around and can't seem to find anything about this. I want to set my eth1-16 to have specific ip addresses and assign some vlan to them, some of which uses the same vlan, like 10.0.1.1/32 for eth1, 10.0.2.1/32 for eth2, etc. Doing

interface ethernet 1/g1

doesn't allow me to assign ip address to it. Similarly, I've found that you can associate VLANs with a certain ip but I want vlan 101 to be associated with eth1-8 so wouldn't all the ports have the same ip address? 

I might just be understanding something wrong but any help would be appreciated. Thanks!

We have a PowerConnect M8024 switch connected to our M1000e chassis. I connected a separate server to one of the 10GB external ports using a Dell 10GBASE SFP+ Twinax Cable. My switch IP is 172.16.17.2 and my server IP is 172.16.17.3. I can ping the switch (172.16.17.2) from one of the blade servers hosted on the M1000e chassis but I cannot ping the separate server (172.16.17.3).  I'm new to this switch, I don't know if the M8024 is configured properly, maybe the external port is not enabled. Need your advise please. Thanks.

10GSW03#show run
!Current Configuration:
!System Description "PowerConnect M8024, 3.1.5.7, VxWorks 6.5"
!System Software Version 3.1.5.7
!System Operational Mode "Simple"
!
configure
mode simple
hostname "10GSW03"
stack
member 1 1
exit
interface out-of-band
ip address none
ip address 172.16.17.2 255.255.255.0 172.16.17.1
exit
ip address none
username "root" password e6e66b8981c1030d5650bc159e79539a level 15 encrypted
exit

Hello,

as I mentioned in subject. I got a new Dell N3024 Switch.  I have worked in cisco before but dell is new for me. I have some question to ask:-

can we configure wan port on it?   

is this switch supports ISL trunking?

if yes please share manual of the switch

thanks in advance

We're having an issue with a N2048P going down and we're getting the following set of messages in the log before it goes down, could anyone provide some assistance on cause/solution?

<189> Nov  5 19:43:23 167.78.222.3-1 TRAPMGR[132133316]: traputil.c(697) 1627 %% Entity Database: Configuration Changed

<189> Nov  5 19:43:22 167.78.222.3-1 TRAPMGR[155501412]: traputil.c(740) 1626 %% Temperature state change alarm: Unit Number: 4 Current: Normal, Previous: None

<190> Nov  5 19:43:20 167.78.222.3-4 BOXSERV[132157764]: boxs.c(461) 1625 %% Error 1 occurred reading thermal sensor 0 data

<190> Nov  5 19:43:18 167.78.222.3-4 BOXSERV[132157764]: boxs.c(461) 1624 %% Error 1 occurred reading thermal sensor 0 data

<190> Nov  5 19:43:16 167.78.222.3-4 BOXSERV[132157764]: boxs.c(461) 1623 %% Error 1 occurred reading thermal sensor 0 data

<190> Nov  5 19:43:14 167.78.222.3-4 BOXSERV[132157764]: boxs.c(461) 1622 %% Error 1 occurred reading thermal sensor 0 data

<189> Nov  5 19:43:13 167.78.222.3-1 TRAPMGR[132004924]: traputil.c(740) 1468 %% Stack Port Link Up: Index: 401 Unit: 4 Tag: 0/52

<189> Nov  5 19:43:13 167.78.222.3-1 TRAPMGR[132004924]: traputil.c(740) 1467 %% Stack Port Link Up: Index: 400 Unit: 4 Tag: 0/51

We need to configure few Dell N2024P switches for Lync VoIP, in addition of the QoS DSCP global configuration do you know if Lync requires to divide the network in two VLANs or is not necessary and prioritizing the traffic via DSCP is enough for voice quality?

Here is the current scenario:

The Lync server is hosted by an outside cloud/VoIP provider, we connect the clients via Lync 2013 autodiscovery with no problems, the majority of the IP Phones are CX600 for MS Lync and the rest are CX300 USB phones or  MS LifeChat 4000 USB headsets.

Each seat have only one Ethernet drop, the CX600 GB is connected to the LAN and the computer to the phone. In all other cases just the computer is connected to the LAN.

Thank you in advance for your help in this matter.

Hi,

I already have port authentication working with dynamic vlan assignment and guest-vlan when authentication is not successful.

My problem is that I want the IP phones (mainly Openstage 40) to be automatically registered within the voice vlan without port authentication. Sadly the phones are not recognized as voice devices and therefore registered within the guest-vlan.

my config is as follows (only the necessary parts):

Gi1/0/1 is working without the voice vlan config

Gi1/0/2 isn't working (not possible is phone is configured for tagging lldp)

Gi1/0/3 isn't working too

dot1x system-auth-control
dot1x system-auth-control monitor
aaa authentication dot1x default radius
aaa authorization network default radius
dot1x dynamic-vlan enable
voice vlan
radius-server host auth this.is.some.ip
primary
name "primary-RadiusServer"
timeout 5
key "something"
exit
radius-server host auth this.is.another.ip
name "2nd-RadiusServer"
timeout 5
key "something
exit
!
interface Gi1/0/1
spanning-tree portfast
spanning-tree guard root
dot1x reauthentication
dot1x timeout guest-vlan-period 15
dot1x max-req 10
dot1x guest-vlan 1001
dot1x unauth-vlan 1001
authentication order dot1x
authentication priority dot1x
exit
!
interface Gi1/0/2
spanning-tree portfast
spanning-tree guard root
dot1x reauthentication
dot1x timeout guest-vlan-period 15
dot1x max-req 10
dot1x guest-vlan 1001
dot1x unauth-vlan 1001
authentication order dot1x
authentication priority dot1x
lldp med confignotification
voice vlan 250
voice vlan auth disable
exit
!
interface Gi1/0/3
spanning-tree portfast
spanning-tree guard root
switchport mode general
switchport general pvid 249
switchport general allowed vlan add 249,251-254,1001
switchport general allowed vlan add 250 tagged
dot1x reauthentication
dot1x timeout guest-vlan-period 15
dot1x max-req 10
dot1x guest-vlan 1001
dot1x unauth-vlan 1001
authentication order dot1x
authentication priority dot1x
lldp med confignotification
voice vlan 250
voice vlan auth disable
exit
!

... isn't there a possibility to define the "oui-table" with the new N2000/N3000/N4000 series?

This N2048P is on the latest available software

Machine Description............... Dell Networking Switch
System Model ID................... N2048P
Machine Type...................... Dell Networking N2048P
Serial Number..................... snip
Manufacturer...................... 0xbc00
Burned In MAC Address............. snip
System Object ID.................. 1.3.6.1.4.1.674.10895.3056
SOC Version....................... BCM56340_A0
HW Version........................ 5
CPLD Version...................... 13

unit active backup current-active next-active
---- ----------- ----------- -------------- --------------
1     6.2.6.6    6.2.0.5   6.2.6.6       6.2.6.6

Thanks

Dell N3024F firmware version 6.2.6.6

Configure a VLAN interface with OSPF

Use the command IP OSPF AUTHENTICATION SIMPLE password

When you run the show run command, the password (or key) displays as encrypted.  The OSPF network connects and runs as expected.

When you reboot the switch, the whole command disappears from the configuration.  The OSPF connection does not work.

I don't get it.  The N4032F at firmware version 6.2.1.6 does not work this way.  Does anybody have any clues for me?

Downgraded to firmware 6.2.1.6 and command works as planned.  Seems there were some firmware changes that broke the SIMPLE version of the command.  I'll hand this one off to Dell.

We have a pair of 6248's, the connection between the two is a lag which multiple vlans run through. We recently deployed IP cameras to replace analog cameras. The camera traffic is on its own vlan however i think we are having issues due to increase in traffic moving across the trunk connection between the two switches.

The cameras are PoE sending untagged traffic into the port. The port is configured to access mode with the appropriate vlan tag.

What would be the best way to implment some QoS to prioritize all other traffic above the camera traffic? 

Diffserv, or CoS? What does the CLI look like for the configuration?

Hello,

I just received several N3048P switches for our access layer and 2x 4048-ON for our core layer. The N3048P's are VLT'd between the two 4048's. There are 4x N3048P's stacked together. The 4048's own all the gateways via VRRP.

I have 802.1x working with my test Windows client, and I can get the phone (Cisco 7941) to acquire a DHCP address if I put it on a "switchport mode access" port. However, if I change the port to a general port with voice vlan enabled and 802.1x, the phone does not get a DHCP address, but the PC attached to the phone still gets a DHCP address in the correct VLAN.

I see CDP and LLDP messages being exchanged via Wireshark, and it looks like the phone and the switch are exchanging the Voice VLAN correctly.

My question is, why can the phone not get a DHCP address?

Here is the relevant config from the switch below. I realize some of the config may be duplicate for troubleshooting measures:

vlan 75
name "Test"
exit
vlan 76
name "Test_Phones"
exit

ip helper-address 1.1.1.3 dhcp
ip helper-address 1.1.1.4 dhcp

interface vlan 75
ip address 172.16.75.4 255.255.255.0
ip helper-address 1.1.1.3
ip helper-address 1.1.1.4
exit
interface vlan 76
ip address 172.16.76.4 255.255.255.0
ip helper-address 1.1.1.3
ip helper-address 1.1.1.4

aaa authentication login "defaultList" local
aaa accounting dot1x default start-stop radius
dot1x system-auth-control
aaa authentication dot1x default radius
aaa authorization network default radius

voice vlan

radius-server source-ip 172.16.75.4
radius-server key "key"
radius-server host auth 1.1.1.1
primary
name "rad1"
usage 802.1x
key "key"
exit
radius-server host auth 1.1.1.2
name "rad2"
usage 802.1x
key "key"
exit
radius-server host acct 1.1.1.1
name "rad1"
exit
radius-server host acct 1.1.1.2
name "rad2"
exit

interface Gi2/0/1

description "802.1x client port"
spanning-tree portfast
spanning-tree guard root
switchport mode general
switchport general allowed vlan add 75-76 tagged
dot1x reauthentication
dot1x timeout quiet-period 5
dot1x timeout tx-period 5
dot1x guest-vlan 20
dot1x unauth-vlan 20
lldp transmit-tlv sys-desc sys-cap
lldp transmit-mgmt
lldp notification
lldp med confignotification
voice vlan 76
voice vlan auth disable
exit

Thank you for any input you may have. Let me know if there is any other information I can provide.

-Jason

Hey,

I'm using RH 7.1 on my physical node and have created a RH 7.1 VM on it. 

I have installed OMNM 6.1 in the VM. But I can't access the dashboard from the browser, all I see is a blank white page. No error or anything. I have tried both Firefox and Chrome.

The service is running and the VM is listening to port 8080.

I started the server from the script startportal.sh in oware/synergy/tomcaqt-x-x-x/bin.

What am I mising here? 

Thanking you in anticipation.

- Fazal

I have configured a few dozen 6224 stacks for customers using EqualLogic SAN units and have enjoyed much success. I recently purchased a used 6224 for home use and I'm seeing very strange problems.

After configuring my 6224 similarly to how I do for customers (ESX hosts ports are trunked and tagged for the iSCSI VLAN, SAN ports are set to Access and untagged access to the iSCSI VLAN, iSCSI optimization is enabled, STP is disabled on all iSCSI endpoint ports, Flow Control is enabled, etc). I cannot get jumbo packets to traverse the switch. From two Dell R710 servers with ESXi 6.0U1a, I can vmkping each other on the iSCSI VLAN just fine, but if I increase the MTU to 9000, I either get dropped packets or no packets received. The same is true for two StarWind SAN units. Keep in mind that this whole setup worked fine with another switch prior to introducing the 6224.

I need some insight into what I might be doing wrong or if the switch might be bad. It came with firmware 3.2.1.3 and I've tried using that and updating to 3.3.13.1 with the same results.

Thanks in advance.

Can anyone explain the difference between the two following port configuations in a Dell PowerConnect 6224 switch?

1/
interface ethernet 1/g6
switchport mode general
switchport general allowed vlan add 10
exit

2/
interface ethernet 1/g6
switchport mode access
switchport access vlan 10
exit

Hi,
I have a Dell M1000e chassis with some servers and a M8024k switch in slot A1.

Now i would like to install another M8024k in slot A2 but i would like to assure myself that the internal ports are shutdown.

Is that possible and how do i make the ports start in shutdown when inserted?

B and C slots are allready occupied .

Kind Regards

M

Hi,

I've been having some troubles with broadcast storms on my company's VOIP network (whichs is isolated from the rest physically). I wanna know how I should configure storm-control on my Dell PCT6224 and 6248 so that the switches can block any overflow of broadcast packets.

But I have a doubt about the value I should use. Here is what the switch help command say: "Enter the storm-control threshold as percent of port speed. Percent of port speed is converted to PacketsPerSecond based on 512 byte average packet size and applied to HW..."

I wonder if my calculations are right:

The ports in which the config will be applied are all in 1Gbps. So if I want to put a 1% threshold the switch will convert to (1000000000*0.001) / (512*8) ~= 2441.4 pps.
 My network runs on a 0.39 pps when its operating correctly so it wont interfere on the normal broadcast traffic.

Hi,

I have create teaming with Broadcom software and Broadcom adopter in PE-R520 server . I have used two different switch for two adopter. The yesterday my second switch cable connected second was failed for some reason that time server is online with teaming first adopter and first switch  but when i installed new switch and after that connect cable to second adopter my server is gone offline with teaming failed.  why this issue has been come because I have created smart load balancing and failover teaming. pls find event log and teaming details . Kindly suggest me how to avoid this issue in future. 

Regards

G 

Hi all, 

I have the switch put in production already. Now im trying to put some ip address and configurations. The problem is that when i connect it through the serial i have just the following prompt ">". Can i configure the SNMPv3 via MCLI or should i press the config/Managed mode button. Also becouse this is production switch, what will happen if i activeate the Managed mode ? Do i have to reboot the switch or the switch will reboot itself ?

Also is there a way to configure SNMPv3 via MCLI 

Thanks

Hello,

I'm looking to configure an IP Address on the default vlan (vlan 1) on an S4048.  However, I receive the following:

Dell#configure terminal

Dell(conf)#interface vlan 1

Dell(conf-if-vl-1)#ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0

% Error: Invalid command for Default Vlan.

I have also tried the following:

Dell# Dell#configure terminal

Dell(conf)#ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0

                     ^

% Error: Invalid input at "^" marker.

Thanks.

I have a Dell N2000 (2024P) that misses enough ping responses to create 'down' page. Upon reviewing logs, there appears to be a strange spanning tree issue (see below). Any ideas on what's happening to this switch? Are there more commands/places to look for more information?

<189> Nov 16 22:34:08 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140762 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0060:4403:a72b:7c80
<189> Nov 16 22:34:00 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140761 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0080:f8b1:566f:2198
<189> Nov 16 22:34:00 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140760 %% Unit 1 elected as the new STP root
<189> Nov 16 22:32:02 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140751 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0060:4403:a72b:7c80
<189> Nov 16 22:32:02 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140750 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0080:f8b1:566f:2198
<189> Nov 16 22:32:02 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140749 %% Unit 1 elected as the new STP root
<189> Nov 16 22:30:20 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140740 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0060:4403:a72b:7c80
<189> Nov 16 22:30:16 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140739 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0080:f8b1:566f:2198
<189> Nov 16 22:30:16 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140738 %% Unit 1 elected as the new STP root
<189> Nov 16 21:41:45 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140531 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0060:4403:a72b:7c80
<189> Nov 16 21:41:45 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140530 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0080:f8b1:566f:2198
<189> Nov 16 21:41:45 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140529 %% Unit 1 elected as the new STP root
<189> Nov 16 21:41:39 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140528 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0060:4403:a72b:7c80
<189> Nov 16 21:40:56 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140527 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0080:f8b1:566f:2198
<189> Nov 16 21:40:56 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140526 %% Unit 1 elected as the new STP root
<189> Nov 16 21:40:50 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140525 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0060:4403:a72b:7c80
<189> Nov 16 21:40:31 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140524 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0080:f8b1:566f:2198
<189> Nov 16 21:40:31 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140523 %% Unit 1 elected as the new STP root
<189> Nov 16 21:40:25 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140522 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0060:4403:a72b:7c80
<189> Nov 16 21:40:25 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140521 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0080:f8b1:566f:2198
<189> Nov 16 21:40:25 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140520 %% Unit 1 elected as the new STP root
<189> Nov 16 21:40:20 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140519 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0060:4403:a72b:7c80
<189> Nov 16 21:40:19 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140518 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0080:f8b1:566f:2198
<189> Nov 16 21:40:19 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140517 %% Unit 1 elected as the new STP root
<189> Nov 16 21:40:04 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140516 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0060:4403:a72b:7c80
<189> Nov 16 21:40:03 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140515 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0080:f8b1:566f:2198
<189> Nov 16 21:40:03 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140514 %% Unit 1 elected as the new STP root
<189> Nov 16 21:36:41 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140501 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0060:4403:a72b:7c80
<189> Nov 16 21:36:39 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140500 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0080:f8b1:566f:2198
<189> Nov 16 21:36:39 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140499 %% Unit 1 elected as the new STP root
<189> Nov 16 21:34:47 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140490 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0060:4403:a72b:7c80
<189> Nov 16 21:34:37 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140489 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0080:f8b1:566f:2198
<189> Nov 16 21:34:37 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140488 %% Unit 1 elected as the new STP root
<189> Nov 16 21:32:47 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140480 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0060:4403:a72b:7c80
<189> Nov 16 21:31:53 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140479 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0080:f8b1:566f:2198
<189> Nov 16 21:31:53 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140478 %% Unit 1 elected as the new STP root
<189> Nov 16 21:31:43 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140477 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0060:4403:a72b:7c80
<189> Nov 16 21:31:43 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140476 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0080:f8b1:566f:2198
<189> Nov 16 21:31:43 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140475 %% Unit 1 elected as the new STP root
<189> Nov 16 21:27:59 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140460 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0060:4403:a72b:7c80
<189> Nov 16 21:27:59 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140459 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0080:f8b1:566f:2198
<189> Nov 16 21:27:59 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140458 %% Unit 1 elected as the new STP root
<189> Nov 16 21:22:47 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140440 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0060:4403:a72b:7c80
<189> Nov 16 21:21:33 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140439 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0080:f8b1:566f:2198
<189> Nov 16 21:21:33 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140438 %% Unit 1 elected as the new STP root
<189> Nov 16 21:17:59 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140420 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0060:4403:a72b:7c80
<189> Nov 16 21:17:59 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140419 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0080:f8b1:566f:2198
<189> Nov 16 21:17:59 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140418 %% Unit 1 elected as the new STP root
<189> Nov 16 21:13:25 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140401 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0060:4403:a72b:7c80
<189> Nov 16 21:12:51 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140400 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0080:f8b1:566f:2198
<189> Nov 16 21:12:51 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140399 %% Unit 1 elected as the new STP root
<189> Nov 16 21:12:41 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140398 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0060:4403:a72b:7c80
<189> Nov 16 21:12:41 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140397 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0080:f8b1:566f:2198
<189> Nov 16 21:12:41 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140396 %% Unit 1 elected as the new STP root
<189> Nov 16 21:09:09 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140376 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0060:4403:a72b:7c80
<189> Nov 16 21:08:55 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140375 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0080:f8b1:566f:2198
<189> Nov 16 21:08:55 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140374 %% Unit 1 elected as the new STP root
<189> Nov 16 21:06:47 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140367 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0060:4403:a72b:7c80
<189> Nov 16 21:06:33 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140366 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0080:f8b1:566f:2198
<189> Nov 16 21:06:33 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140365 %% Unit 1 elected as the new STP root
<189> Nov 16 21:05:09 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140354 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0060:4403:a72b:7c80
<189> Nov 16 21:05:09 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140353 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0080:f8b1:566f:2198
<189> Nov 16 21:05:09 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140352 %% Unit 1 elected as the new STP root
<189> Nov 16 21:04:47 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140351 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0060:4403:a72b:7c80
<189> Nov 16 21:03:33 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140350 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0080:f8b1:566f:2198
<189> Nov 16 21:03:33 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140349 %% Unit 1 elected as the new STP root
<189> Nov 16 21:00:01 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140332 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0060:4403:a72b:7c80
<189> Nov 16 20:59:49 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140331 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0080:f8b1:566f:2198
<189> Nov 16 20:59:49 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140330 %% Unit 1 elected as the new STP root
<189> Nov 16 20:56:21 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140317 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0060:4403:a72b:7c80
<189> Nov 16 20:56:19 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140316 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0080:f8b1:566f:2198
<189> Nov 16 20:56:19 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140315 %% Unit 1 elected as the new STP root
<189> Nov 16 20:54:25 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140310 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0060:4403:a72b:7c80
<189> Nov 16 20:53:09 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140309 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0080:f8b1:566f:2198
<189> Nov 16 20:53:09 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140308 %% Unit 1 elected as the new STP root
<189> Nov 16 20:53:03 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140307 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0060:4403:a72b:7c80
<189> Nov 16 20:53:03 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140306 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0080:f8b1:566f:2198
<189> Nov 16 20:53:03 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140305 %% Unit 1 elected as the new STP root
<189> Nov 16 20:52:53 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140304 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0060:4403:a72b:7c80
<189> Nov 16 20:52:53 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140303 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0080:f8b1:566f:2198
<189> Nov 16 20:52:53 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140302 %% Unit 1 elected as the new STP root
<189> Nov 16 20:52:47 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140301 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0060:4403:a72b:7c80
<189> Nov 16 20:52:47 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140300 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0080:f8b1:566f:2198
<189> Nov 16 20:52:47 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140299 %% Unit 1 elected as the new STP root
<189> Nov 16 20:38:43 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140243 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0060:4403:a72b:7c80
<189> Nov 16 20:38:43 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140242 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0080:f8b1:566f:2198
<189> Nov 16 20:38:43 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140241 %% Unit 1 elected as the new STP root
<189> Nov 16 19:35:14 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140020 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0060:4403:a72b:7c80
<189> Nov 16 19:35:00 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140019 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0080:f8b1:566f:2198
<189> Nov 16 19:35:00 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 140018 %% Unit 1 elected as the new STP root
<189> Nov 16 19:25:28 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 139993 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0060:4403:a72b:7c80
<189> Nov 16 19:25:24 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 139989 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0080:f8b1:566f:2198
<189> Nov 16 19:25:24 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 139988 %% Unit 1 elected as the new STP root
<189> Nov 16 19:23:24 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 139983 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0060:4403:a72b:7c80
<189> Nov 16 19:22:58 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 139982 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0080:f8b1:566f:2198
<189> Nov 16 19:22:58 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 139981 %% Unit 1 elected as the new STP root
<189> Nov 16 19:16:34 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 139960 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0060:4403:a72b:7c80
<189> Nov 16 19:16:30 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 139959 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0080:f8b1:566f:2198
<189> Nov 16 19:16:30 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 139958 %% Unit 1 elected as the new STP root
<189> Nov 16 19:14:18 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 139944 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0060:4403:a72b:7c80
<189> Nov 16 19:13:28 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 139943 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0080:f8b1:566f:2198
<189> Nov 16 19:13:28 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 139942 %% Unit 1 elected as the new STP root
<189> Nov 16 19:13:22 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 139941 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0060:4403:a72b:7c80
<189> Nov 16 19:13:22 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 139940 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0080:f8b1:566f:2198
<189> Nov 16 19:13:22 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 139939 %% Unit 1 elected as the new STP root
<189> Nov 16 19:06:06 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 139909 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0060:4403:a72b:7c80
<189> Nov 16 19:04:58 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 139908 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0080:f8b1:566f:2198
<189> Nov 16 19:04:58 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 139907 %% Unit 1 elected as the new STP root
<189> Nov 16 19:04:44 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 139906 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0060:4403:a72b:7c80
<189> Nov 16 19:04:44 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 139905 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0080:f8b1:566f:2198
<189> Nov 16 19:04:44 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 139904 %% Unit 1 elected as the new STP root
<189> Nov 16 19:04:36 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 139903 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0060:4403:a72b:7c80
<189> Nov 16 19:04:36 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 139902 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0080:f8b1:566f:2198
<189> Nov 16 19:04:36 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 139901 %% Unit 1 elected as the new STP root
<189> Nov 16 17:02:33 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 139482 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0060:4403:a72b:7c80
<189> Nov 16 17:02:31 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 139481 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0080:f8b1:566f:2198
<189> Nov 16 17:02:31 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 139480 %% Unit 1 elected as the new STP root
<189> Nov 16 17:02:17 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 139475 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0060:4403:a72b:7c80
<189> Nov 16 17:02:07 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 139474 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0080:f8b1:566f:2198
<189> Nov 16 17:02:07 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 139473 %% Unit 1 elected as the new STP root
<189> Nov 16 16:55:41 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 139457 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0060:4403:a72b:7c80
<189> Nov 16 16:55:39 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 139456 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0080:f8b1:566f:2198
<189> Nov 16 16:55:39 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 139455 %% Unit 1 elected as the new STP root
<189> Nov 16 16:53:29 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 139450 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0060:4403:a72b:7c80
<189> Nov 16 16:53:25 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 139449 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0080:f8b1:566f:2198
<189> Nov 16 16:53:25 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 139448 %% Unit 1 elected as the new STP root
<189> Nov 16 16:53:19 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 139447 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0060:4403:a72b:7c80
<189> Nov 16 16:53:13 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 139446 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0080:f8b1:566f:2198
<189> Nov 16 16:53:13 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 139445 %% Unit 1 elected as the new STP root
<189> Nov 16 16:53:07 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 139444 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0060:4403:a72b:7c80
<189> Nov 16 16:53:03 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 139443 %% Instance 0 has elected a new STP root: 0080:f8b1:566f:2198
<189> Nov 16 16:53:03 dn2024p-sw1 TRAPMGR[trapTask]: traputil.c(735) 139442 %% Unit 1 elected as the new STP root